What is the Maya Tzolkʼin?

A calendar you can check against carved stone — and what we refuse to invent.

The idea, in plain words

The Maya kept several calendars at once and read a date as all of them together. The one people usually mean is the Tzolkʼin: a 260-day sacred count made of 13 numbers turning against 20 named days. Number and name step forward side by side — 1 Imix, 2 Ikʼ, 3 Akʼbʼal — and after 260 days the pair you started with comes back around.

The day you were born has a name in that count. Maya tradition calls it your nawal. It is not a verdict on your life; it is the character of the day you arrived on, and the number beside it is how strongly that day was running.

Why the sacred count is 260 days — two wheels that cannot slipTwo meshing gears. The small wheel has thirteen teeth, one for each tone, numbered 1 to 13. The large wheel has twenty teeth, one for each named day-sign, from Imix round to Ajaw. Every day both wheels advance by exactly one tooth, so the number and the name step forward together: 1 Imix, then 2 Ikʼ, then 3 Akʼbʼal. Because thirteen and twenty share no common factor, no pairing repeats early — the wheels must turn through thirteen times twenty, which is 260 days, before the same tooth meets the same tooth again. That is the whole reason the Tzolkʼin is 260 days long, and it is why the count cannot drift: it is gearing, not observation. The teeth touching in this drawing are tone 5 and the day-sign Ix, known in Kʼicheʼ as Bʼalam. That is the pairing Bokki computes for a birth on 20 March 1995, whose full Calendar Round position is 5 Ix 7 Kumkʼu.12345678910111213ImixIkʼAkʼbʼalKʼanChikchanKimiManikʼLamatMulukOkChuwenEbʼBʼenIxMenKibʼKabʼanEtzʼnabʼKawakAjaw13 tones20 named day-signs13 and 20 share no factor → 13 × 20 = 260 days before the pair returns1995-03-20 · 5 Ix (Kʼicheʼ: Bʼalam) · Calendar Round 5 Ix 7 Kumkʼu

How Bokki calculates it

Everything comes from one number: how many days have passed since the Maya era base. Bokki turns your date into a Julian Day Number, subtracts 584283, and the whole date falls out of that single count by plain arithmetic.

That constant is the whole game. 584283 is the GMT correlation — Goodman, Martínez and Thompson — the day in our calendar that carries Long Count 0.0.0.0.0, which the Maya wrote 4 Ajaw 8 Kumkʼu. It is the standard, and it is still a choice: the rival constant 584285 moves every result by two days. A Maya date you cannot trace back to a constant is a date you cannot check, so we pin 584283 and say so on the page.

From that elapsed count: the tone is ((3 + elapsed) mod 13) + 1 and the day-sign is (19 + elapsed) mod 20. The Haabʼ — the 365-day year of eighteen 20-day months plus the five nameless days of Wayebʼ — is (348 + elapsed) mod 365. The Long Count is the same number written in base 20, 18, 20, 20: bʼakʼtun, kʼatun, tun, winal, kʼin. The Lord of the Night is ((elapsed + 8) mod 9) + 1.

Because it is arithmetic and not opinion, it can be checked — so we check it. Our tests pin seven carved dates, each a Long Count written beside its Calendar Round, with the Gregorian day our constant gives them — among them 13.0.0.0.0 = 4 Ajaw 3 Kʼankʼin = 21 December 2012, and Pakal's accession at Palenque, 9.9.2.4.8 = 5 Lamat 1 Mol = 27 July 615. If a change ever broke the arithmetic or moved the constant, those tests would go red before anybody saw a wrong date.

One more thing falls out for free. The Tzolkʼin and the Haabʼ return to the same pairing every 18,980 days — 52 haabʼ, 73 tzolkʼin — so Bokki can also name the exact Gregorian date on which your own Calendar Round comes round again.

What we do not calculate

We do not use the Dreamspell. José Argüelles' 1987 system also has 13 tones and 20 signs, but it runs a different day count, so for most birthdays it gives a different answer from the traditional one. It is a modern creation, not the long count the Maya kept. If a site hands you a colour, a Kin number and a galactic signature, that is Dreamspell, and it is not what Bokki computes.

We do not give the Lords of the Night meanings. There were nine and they cycle with the days, but their names are lost. Epigraphers write G1 through G9 and nothing more is known. Bokki gives you the number and stops there.

We do not read the Haabʼ month as a personality. The Haabʼ is a date — a position in the solar year — and the tradition does not treat it the way it treats the nawal. Several month names have disputed etymology. Inventing a meaning for one would be exactly the failure this project exists to refuse.

And we are not daykeepers. The living authority on this count is the modern Maya ajqʼij — a trained person inside a community, in Guatemala and Mexico, where the 260-day count has never stopped being kept. Bokki computes the date. Reading a life from it belongs to them.

Why every day has two names

In Bokki you will see two names for the same sign: Imix and Imox, Ajaw and Ajpu. The first is Yucatec, the spelling most books use; the second is Kʼicheʼ, the language of many daykeepers today. Maya is not one language but a family of around thirty living ones, and the count is still kept in several of them. Printing one name only would quietly pick a winner, so we print both and label which is which.

Closing note — one subtracted number, and what holds it in place

In short: your whole Maya date falls out of one subtraction — Julian Day Number minus 584283, the GMT correlation — and every other number on the page (tone, day-sign, Haabʼ position, Lord of the Night, Long Count) is plain arithmetic on that one elapsed count. Be exact about what holds the constant in place. The seven carved dates our tests pin, from 13.0.0.0.0 to Pakal's accession at Palenque, 9.9.2.4.8, prove the arithmetic — each carved date pairs a Long Count with a Calendar Round, and we reproduce all seven — but they cannot choose the constant: 584285 reproduces every one of them too, only landing each on a Gregorian day two later. What chooses 584283 lies outside the stones. Radiocarbon on a carved Tikal lintel (Kennett and colleagues, 2013) rules out correlations centuries away, and the 260-day count highland Kʼicheʼ daykeepers still keep put 8 Bʼatzʼ on 18 January and 5 October 2025 — the days 584283 gives, and two days from what 584285 would give.

The same arithmetic gives you something for free: the Tzolkʼin and the Haabʼ return to the same pairing every 18,980 days — 52 Haabʼ cycles, 73 Tzolkʼin cycles — so Bokki can also name the date your own Calendar Round comes around again. What none of that arithmetic tries to do is speak for a living tradition: the Lords of the Night keep their numbers (G1 through G9) because their names are genuinely lost, and reading a life from a nawal is left to the ajqʼij who still keep this count in Guatemala and Mexico today — which is also why every day-sign on this page carries two names, Yucatec and Kʼicheʼ, instead of one language quietly standing in for all of them.

See my Maya date →

Read next

← Bokki home

Questions people actually ask

How is a Maya day-sign calculated?

From a single number: the days elapsed since the Maya era base. Bokki turns your date into a Julian Day Number, subtracts the correlation constant 584283, and reads everything off that one count — the tone is ((3 + elapsed) mod 13) + 1 and the day-sign is (19 + elapsed) mod 20, with the Haabʼ, the Long Count and the Lord of the Night falling out of the same figure. It is arithmetic, so it can be checked.

Which correlation constant does Bokki use?

584283 — the GMT (Goodman–Martínez–Thompson) correlation, at which Long Count 0.0.0.0.0 is 4 Ajaw 8 Kumkʼu. This matters more than it sounds: the rival constant 584285 shifts every result by two days, so a Maya date is unverifiable unless you know which constant produced it. Bokki pins 584283 and says so on the page. The seven carved monument dates in our tests check the arithmetic, not the constant — 584285 reproduces them too. What picks 584283 is the 260-day count highland Kʼicheʼ daykeepers still keep: it put 8 Bʼatzʼ on 18 January 2025, the day 584283 gives.

Is this the same as the Dreamspell or a galactic signature?

No. The Dreamspell, published by José Argüelles in 1987, also has 13 tones and 20 signs, but it runs a different day count, so for most birthdays it gives a different answer from the traditional one. Bokki computes the long count still kept by Maya daykeepers, not the Dreamspell, and does not use terms like galactic signature or Kin number.

Did the Maya calendar end in 2012?

No. 21 December 2012 was 13.0.0.0.0, the completion of the thirteenth bʼakʼtun — a big round number inside a count that simply keeps going. The following day is written 13.0.0.0.1, and Bokki writes post-2012 dates exactly that way, with no reset and no ending.